|
Section
1: Introduction to Biological Theory
Section
2: Hans Eysenck's Structure of Personality
Section
3: Temperament and Personality
Section
4: Biological Theory: Research and Trends
Hans
Eysenck
For
years, biological theory played a significant role
in our view of human development and
personality. Toward the beginning of the 2oth
Century, however, views began to change and
personality was seen as involving both biology and
environment. Hans Eysenck, however, fought
against this trend. By using the statistic
known as Factor
Analysis, he concluded that all human traits can
be broken down into two distinct categories:
1. Extroversion-Introversion
2. Neuroticism
He
called these categories Supertraits
(See figure below). According to his theory,
everyone exhibits specific responses to both
internal and external stimuli. These specific
responses will vary according to the intensity of
the stimuli, the situation, state of mind, and many
other factors. At some point, however, we will
begin to see trends in how we respond. A
person who is very concerned with how other people
view her, might shy away from a stranger in most
specific situations. When this behavior
becomes the normal way to respond to new people, the
response then becomes a habit.

Suppose
now that she also avoids public settings where a
large number of people gather, or possibly limits
her social activity to only a few trusted
friends. When all of these habitual responses
are combined, the become part of a larger group
known as a trait. In this case, the trait may
be called shyness or perhaps even social phobia.
This
trait, Social phobia, is a component of one of the
three supertraits, introversion-extroversion.
If we see that she also prefers soft music over loud
music, intellectual pursuits over than team sports,
or other similar solo activities, we could then
classify her as an introvert.
When
we look at an individuals specific responses,
combine them into habitual responses, further
develop a set of specific traits and then determine
where they fall on the two supertraits, we would
notice that the vast differences in personality prohibit
us from such a simple theory. Because of this,
Eysenck argued that there were varying degrees of
each of the two supertraits and most of us fall
somewhere on the spectrum between Stable versus
Unstable (neurotic) and Introverted versus
Extroverted.
The
figure below describes that diagram. The
person who is high on extroversion and high on
stability may fall in the lower right quadrant of
the circle. Those who are less stable and more
introverted would fall somewhere in the upper left. According to this diagram, each of us
will ultimately fall somewhere on the circle based
on a sum of our responses and traits.

|